The American Academy Of Pain Medicine

The physicians' voice in pain medicine
  • Foundation
  • Store
  • Career Center
  • Press
  • Join-Renew
Search: Go
Member Login: Login

Enter the AAPM
Members' Community

  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Safe Prescribing Resources
  • PI-CME Portal

Library

Home > Library > For Pain Researchers > 2012 Poster Abstracts
  • Research in the News
  • For Pain Researchers
    • 2013 Poster Abstracts
    • 2012 Poster Abstracts
    • Research Resources
    • Research Presentations
    • Search Clinical Trials (NIH)
    • Register a Clinical Trial (NIH)
    • Medline - US National Library of Medicine
  • Clinical Guidelines and Resources
  • Pain Facts
  • Archives
  • FDA Updates, Recalls and Warnings
  • Presented at the 2012 AAPM Annual Meeting « Back

    121

    RestoreSensor Study Results: SCS Therapy Impedance Does Not Vary Significantly with Changes in Body Position

    David M. Schultz, MD, dschultz@painphysicians.com1, Lynn R. Webster, MD2, Ye Tan, MS3, Dennis Skelton, BS3, Mark Sun, PhD3, Eric Panken, MS3, (1) MAPS Applied Research Center, Edina, Minnesota, (2) Lifetree Clinical Research, Salt Lake City, Utah, (3) Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota

    View Poster

    Introduction: Studies have reported spinal cord stimulation therapy impedance changes occur within several weeks after implant and impedance does not correlate with body position. We report on impedance variations during a 16-week study. Materials and Methods: Patients in a prospective, multicenter, randomized crossover, IRB-approved study of position-adaptive stimulation were implanted with a RestoreSensor™ neurostimulator (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN). Impedance was recorded in supine and upright positions at 1, 4, 10, and 16 weeks post-implant. Group impedances by visit and position from all active programs were averaged for each patient. Variation in impedance with position over time and relative percent difference between upright and supine positions were analyzed. Results: In 76 implanted patients (mean age 52.8 years, 59% female) median impedance was 346 Ohms (upright) and 347 Ohms (supine) at 1 week post-implant , and increased to 441 Ohms (upright) and 444 Ohms (supine) at 16 weeks post-implant (Figure 1). The median impedances were nearly the same between the upright and supine positions at each follow-up visit. The effect of position was not statistically significant (p = 0.610). The average relative percent difference in impedance between upright and supine positions was 3% (SD 8.6%). Conclusions: Differences in impedance between the upright and supine positions were insignificant. Impedance for both positions increased initially and stabilized over time. Impedance does not vary with body position although impedance increases during the healing period when electrode encapsulation occurs.

    Funding: The RestoreSensor study was funded by Medtronic, Inc.

    Figure 1. Median group impedance by visit and position
    Poster 121

  • Home
  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Community
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Close

Members Only Alert Message

Please login to access AAPM member only information.
Forgot your login information?

Sign Up Today!

Join AAPM today and be part of the primary organization for physicians practicing in the specialty of pain medicine and begin accessing AAPM member benefits. 

Join
Or

Log In

Please log in and you will be redirected to the requested page.

Log In