The American Academy Of Pain Medicine

The physicians' voice in pain medicine
  • Foundation
  • Store
  • Career Center
  • Press
  • Join-Renew
Search: Go
Member Login: Login

Enter the AAPM
Members' Community

  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Safe Prescribing Resources
  • PI-CME Portal

Library

Home > Library > For Pain Researchers > 2012 Poster Abstracts
  • Research in the News
  • For Pain Researchers
    • 2013 Poster Abstracts
    • 2012 Poster Abstracts
    • Research Resources
    • Research Presentations
    • Search Clinical Trials (NIH)
    • Register a Clinical Trial (NIH)
    • Medline - US National Library of Medicine
  • Clinical Guidelines and Resources
  • Pain Facts
  • Archives
  • FDA Updates, Recalls and Warnings
  • Presented at the 2012 AAPM Annual Meeting « Back

    123

    The Potential Value of Objective Patient Activity Data Recorded in an Implantable Neurostimulation Device in the Assessment of Therapy Efficacy

    Dennis Skelton, BS, dennis.m.skelton@medtronic.com1, Lisa Johanek, PhD1, Nick Mairs, BS1, Eric Panken, MS1, (1) Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota

    Introduction: Pain often impacts a patient’s overall function including their level of physical activity. The RestoreSensor™ implantable neurostimulator (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) was designed to automatically collect information on patient activity. This objective data could prove useful in the evaluation of patient response to treatment. Patient activity data: The AdaptiveStim Diary™ feature included in the RestoreSensor device quantifies patient behaviors and graphically reports trending information including: a) Position Trend (Figure 1): average amount of time per day a patient spends in various postures over time; b) Resting Trend (Figure 2): average number of times per day a patient changes from one lying position to another lying position over time. Conclusions: Clinicians commonly rely on the patient’s reported perception of pain and quality of life when evaluating therapy efficacy. However, subjective reporting of pain can be problematic due to biased recall and variability in the experience of pain. Additionally, the possibility that activity impacts pain and vice-versa may confound assessment of therapy efficacy. Therefore, patient perception alone is not always enough for clinicians to evaluate therapy efficacy. Clinicians can use the patient postures and activity levels recorded in the RestoreSensor device to track patient behavior between visits. This type of objective data collection is new to the field of spinal cord stimulation and will build a scientific understanding of the utility of activity and posture trends in the ongoing assessment of therapy efficacy.

    Funding: Development of the position-adaptive spinal cord stimulation technology described in the abstract was funded by Medtronic, Inc.

    Poster 123

  • Home
  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Community
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Close

Members Only Alert Message

Please login to access AAPM member only information.
Forgot your login information?

Sign Up Today!

Join AAPM today and be part of the primary organization for physicians practicing in the specialty of pain medicine and begin accessing AAPM member benefits. 

Join
Or

Log In

Please log in and you will be redirected to the requested page.

Log In