The American Academy Of Pain Medicine

The physicians' voice in pain medicine
  • Foundation
  • Store
  • Career Center
  • Press
  • Join-Renew
Search: Go
Member Login: Login

Enter the AAPM
Members' Community

  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Safe Prescribing Resources
  • PI-CME Portal

Library

Home > Library > For Pain Researchers > 2012 Poster Abstracts
  • Research in the News
  • For Pain Researchers
    • 2013 Poster Abstracts
    • 2012 Poster Abstracts
    • Research Resources
    • Research Presentations
    • Search Clinical Trials (NIH)
    • Register a Clinical Trial (NIH)
    • Medline - US National Library of Medicine
  • Clinical Guidelines and Resources
  • Pain Facts
  • Archives
  • FDA Updates, Recalls and Warnings
  • Presented at the 2012 AAPM Annual Meeting « Back

    136

    The Degree of Pain Relief from Intraarticular Steroid Injection of the Sacroiliac Joint Does Not Predict the Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation of the Lateral Branches

    Jianguo Cheng, MD PhD, chengj@ccf.org1, Jason Pope, MD1, Jarrod Dalton, MS1, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

    We aimed to determine if the degree of pain relief after sacroiliac joint (SIJ) steroid injection is predictive of the duration of pain relief after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the lateral branches. With IRB approval, we collected data from 80 patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation. The degree of pain relief as a result of SIJ injection was characterized as either <50% (in 20 patients) or ≥50% (in 60 patients). Our primary outcome is the duration of pain relief after RFA, defined as the time until the patient reported <50% pain relief. Before adjusting for potential confounders, we did not find a significant univariable relationship between the degree of pain relief after steroid injection and duration of pain relief after RFA (P = 0.91, Sun’s test). After adjusting for such variables as age, modes of pain onset, multiple pain complaints, and responses to extension or axial rotation of the lumbar spine in the multivariable proportional hazards model, the difference in duration of post-RFA pain relief between the two groups (≥50% or <50% pain relief) remained insignificant (P = 0.91, hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] of 0.96 [0.49, 1.90]. In conclusion, we found no evidence that post-RFA pain relief differed between patients who experienced ≥50% pain relief after SIJ steroid injection and patients who experienced <50% pain relief, even after adjustment for potential confounders. Thus the degree of pain relief after SIJ steroid injection is a poor predictor of the efficacy of RFA.

    Funding: Internal funding from the Anesthesiology Institute of Cleveland Clinic supported part of the study.

  • Home
  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Community
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Close

Members Only Alert Message

Please login to access AAPM member only information.
Forgot your login information?

Sign Up Today!

Join AAPM today and be part of the primary organization for physicians practicing in the specialty of pain medicine and begin accessing AAPM member benefits. 

Join
Or

Log In

Please log in and you will be redirected to the requested page.

Log In