The American Academy Of Pain Medicine

The physicians' voice in pain medicine
  • Foundation
  • Store
  • Career Center
  • Press
  • Join-Renew
Search: Go
Member Login: Login

Enter the AAPM
Members' Community

  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Safe Prescribing Resources
  • PI-CME Portal

Library

Home > Library > For Pain Researchers > 2012 Poster Abstracts
  • Research in the News
  • For Pain Researchers
    • 2013 Poster Abstracts
    • 2012 Poster Abstracts
    • Research Resources
    • Research Presentations
    • Search Clinical Trials (NIH)
    • Register a Clinical Trial (NIH)
    • Medline - US National Library of Medicine
  • Clinical Guidelines and Resources
  • Pain Facts
  • Archives
  • FDA Updates, Recalls and Warnings
  • Presented at the 2012 AAPM Annual Meeting « Back

    208

    A Systematic, Comprehensive Approach to Improve Pain Outcomes Throughout a Hospice Population

    J. Cameron Muir, MD, cmuir@capitalcaring.org1, Matthew G. Kestenbaum, MD1, Brad Beukema, MS, Barry Hess1, Stephen R. Connor, PhD1, Malene Davis, MBA MSN RN1, Perry G. Fine, MD2, (1) Capital Caring, Falls Church, Virginia, (2) University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

    View Poster

    Pain prevalence in the advanced disease patient population has been well documented. Characterization of pain in the hospice population and systematic efforts to both measure and improve pain outcomes in the hospice population are limited. For self-assessment and quality improvement, we established uniform processes to measure and improve pain outcomes in a highly heterogeneous 1000+ census hospice population across seven communities around metropolitan Washington DC. Through adaptation of the electronic health record (EHR), we will report on how we were able to systematically record pain intensity levels for all hospice patients at every single clinical encounter using either a patient self report through numeric self rating (NSR) or, for those patients who were cognitively impaired, using the PAIN-AD tool. We determined that 52% of patients were able to self-report, while 48% of hospice patients were cognitively impaired such that pain determination had to be through behavioral assessment using the PAIN-AD tool. In addition, we launched a comprehensive pain assessment and management education program involving over 400 clinical staff (the entire hospice organization) to ensure that clinicians could appropriately respond to problematic pain scenarios. Finally, we will describe methods used to implement systematic reporting of pain assessment scores in a "real-time" basis enabling immediate responses to poorly controlled pain. At baseline measurement, we found that 42% of all patients admitted to hospice care had a pain score of >= 5/10; 68% of these patients had relief of their pain to mild or less (<=4/10) within 72 hours of start of hospice care. We will describe the structure and process changes (education, documentation, and technology interventions) that were put in place over the subsequent 24 months that led to a significant improvement in pain outcomes. At the conclusion of this phase of the project, pain is now relieved to mild or less in 94.6% of all patients within 48 hours of start of hospice care.

    Funding: None

  • Home
  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Community
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Close

Members Only Alert Message

Please login to access AAPM member only information.
Forgot your login information?

Sign Up Today!

Join AAPM today and be part of the primary organization for physicians practicing in the specialty of pain medicine and begin accessing AAPM member benefits. 

Join
Or

Log In

Please log in and you will be redirected to the requested page.

Log In