The American Academy Of Pain Medicine

The physicians' voice in pain medicine
  • Foundation
  • Store
  • Career Center
  • Press
  • Join-Renew
Search: Go
Member Login: Login

Enter the AAPM
Members' Community

  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Safe Prescribing Resources
  • PI-CME Portal

Library

Home > Library > For Pain Researchers > 2012 Poster Abstracts
  • Research in the News
  • For Pain Researchers
    • 2013 Poster Abstracts
    • 2012 Poster Abstracts
    • Research Resources
    • Research Presentations
    • Search Clinical Trials (NIH)
    • Register a Clinical Trial (NIH)
    • Medline - US National Library of Medicine
  • Clinical Guidelines and Resources
  • Pain Facts
  • Archives
  • FDA Updates, Recalls and Warnings
  • Presented at the 2012 AAPM Annual Meeting « Back

    255

    Diclofenac Sodium 1% Gel in Patients with Hand Osteoarthritis: Effectiveness in Patients with First Carpometacarpal Joint Involvement

    John H. Peniston, DO, jhpdo@aol.com1, Morris S. Gold, ScD2, Matthew Wieman, MD3, Roy D. Altman, MD4, (1) Feasterville Family Health Care Center, Jamison, Pennsylvania, (2) Novartis Consumer Health, Parsippany, New Jersey, (3) Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, (4) David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California

    View Poster

    Introduction/Statement of Problem: Diclofenac sodium 1% gel (DSG) is efficacious for treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the hand, but relative efficacy in the first carpometacarpal (CMC1) and intraphalangeal (IP) joints has not been compared. Materials and Methods: Patients (aged ≥40 y) with hand OA applied DSG or vehicle gel, 2 g per hand, four times daily for 8 weeks. Assessments at 6 weeks included pain intensity (100-mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) subscales for pain, stiffness, and function. Efficacy was compared in patients with OA in CMC1 only (n = 34), CMC1 plus ≥1 IP joint (CMC1+; n=241), and IP joints only (no CMC1; n = 110). Institutional review board approval and patient informed consent were obtained. Results: DSG was superior to vehicle in all patient subgroups for VAS pain (40%–49% vs. 34%–37% improvement) and AUSCAN pain (30%–43% vs. 28%–30%). Reductions in stiffness versus vehicle occurred for CMC1+ (42% vs. 27%) and no CMC1 (35% vs. 22%). Improvements in function versus vehicle occurred only for CMC1+ (41% vs. 28%) and no CMC1 (35% vs. 24%). For CMC1 only, improvements were similar for stiffness (24% vs. 21%) and function (25% vs. 25%). Conclusions: DSG reduced pain in all finger joints, but improved function and stiffness only in patients with OA of the IP joints. Because neither DSG nor vehicle have disease-modifying mechanisms, pain relief alone is likely responsible for the observed improvement of function and stiffness.

    Funding: This study was funded by Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Chadds Ford, PA.

  • Home
  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Community
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Close

Members Only Alert Message

Please login to access AAPM member only information.
Forgot your login information?

Sign Up Today!

Join AAPM today and be part of the primary organization for physicians practicing in the specialty of pain medicine and begin accessing AAPM member benefits. 

Join
Or

Log In

Please log in and you will be redirected to the requested page.

Log In