The American Academy Of Pain Medicine

The physicians' voice in pain medicine
  • Foundation
  • Store
  • Career Center
  • Press
  • Join-Renew
Search: Go
Member Login: Login

Enter the AAPM
Members' Community

  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Safe Prescribing Resources
  • PI-CME Portal

Library

Home > Library > For Pain Researchers > 2013 Poster Abstracts
  • Research in the News
  • For Pain Researchers
    • 2013 Poster Abstracts
    • 2012 Poster Abstracts
    • Research Resources
    • Research Presentations
    • Search Clinical Trials (NIH)
    • Register a Clinical Trial (NIH)
    • Medline - US National Library of Medicine
  • Clinical Guidelines and Resources
  • Pain Facts
  • Archives
  • FDA Updates, Recalls and Warnings
  • Presented at the 2013 AAPM Annual Meeting « Back

    136

    Intrathecal Treatment (IT) of Nociceptive and Neuropathic Pain: Morphine vs. Ziconotide

    Lara Tollapi, MD, meryparoli@hotmail.it1, Mery Paroli, PsycD1, Franca Bondi, MD1, Paolo Poli, MD2, (1) Santa Chiara University Hospital, Pisa, Italy, (2) Pisa University, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy

    Introduction: We want to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of IT administration of morphine versus ziconotide in patients with complex pain. Materials and Methods: 61 patients with complex pain received a mono drug/pharmacological IT treatment. 38 patients were treated with morphine and 23 with ziconotide. 65% of our sample were oncologic patients. 43 patients were implanted with Medtronic Synchromed II® and 18 with Prometra Programmable pump® Results: Enrolled morphine-treated patients VAS pain score at baseline (T0) was 8,7 while ziconotide-treated was 8,9. Mean morphine dose at T0 was 0.54 mg/die and ziconotide was 0,67 mcg/die, after 1 month (T1) mean morphine dose was 2.1 mg/die and ziconotide was 2,7 mcg/die. Mean morphine dosage at 3 months (T2) was 3,8 mg/die and ziconotide was 3,6 mcg/die at six months (T3) after the implant was 5.3 mg/die and ziconotide was 4,8 mcg/die, 1 year after morphine dosage was 6.4 mg/die and ziconotide was 5.4 mcg/die. No significant differences were observed at T1 between morphine and ziconotide in analgesic effect. During the other follow-up ziconotide showed to be more effective than morphine (p<.001). Some adverse events (Aes) such as dysesthesia, burning throat, pyosis and auditory hallucinations were observed in 9 ziconotide patients. Hallucinations, vomiting and unsteadiness when walking (dizziness) were observed in 11 morphine patients. 4 patients interrupted ziconotide and 2 interrupted morphine because of Aes. 7 oncologic patient died during the study due to their own pathology. Conclusion: Despite side effects, ziconotide resulted better than morphine in pain relief.

    Funding: None

  • Home
  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Community
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Close

Members Only Alert Message

Please login to access AAPM member only information.
Forgot your login information?

Sign Up Today!

Join AAPM today and be part of the primary organization for physicians practicing in the specialty of pain medicine and begin accessing AAPM member benefits. 

Join
Or

Log In

Please log in and you will be redirected to the requested page.

Log In