The American Academy Of Pain Medicine

The physicians' voice in pain medicine
  • Foundation
  • Store
  • Career Center
  • Press
  • Join-Renew
Search: Go
Member Login: Login

Enter the AAPM
Members' Community

  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Safe Prescribing Resources
  • PI-CME Portal

Library

Home > Library > For Pain Researchers > 2013 Poster Abstracts
  • Research in the News
  • For Pain Researchers
    • 2013 Poster Abstracts
    • 2012 Poster Abstracts
    • Research Resources
    • Research Presentations
    • Search Clinical Trials (NIH)
    • Register a Clinical Trial (NIH)
    • Medline - US National Library of Medicine
  • Clinical Guidelines and Resources
  • Pain Facts
  • Archives
  • FDA Updates, Recalls and Warnings
  • Presented at the 2013 AAPM Annual Meeting « Back

    159

    Evaluating the Impact of the Utah Clinical Guidelines on Prescribing Opioids for Treatment of Pain on Opioid Prescribing in Utah, 2002–2009

    Brian C. Sauer, PhD, brian.sauer@utah.edu1, Christy Porucznik, PhD MSPH1, Chia-Chen Teng, MSTAT1, Steven G. Pickard, MBA1, Erin Johnson, MPH2, Jonathan Nebeker3, (1) University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, (2) Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, (3) Veterans Administration, Salt Lake City, Utah

    Objective: The objective of this analysis was to quantify changes in opioid prescribing and adverse events before guideline development (pre-period) during development and reporting of opioid concerns (intermittent period) and after promulgation of the Guidelines (post-period). Methods: This study was IRB approved by the University of Utah. Multiple data sources were used for this analysis including the Utah Controlled Substances Database (CSD), Utah ED encounter database, and the state medical examiner database. Process flags included the dual use of long-acting opioids or short-acting opioids, combined use of benzodiazepines and long-acting opioids, methadone titration. Outcome flags included the opioid related ED visits and deaths. Opioid users were categorized as acute, intermittent, chronic or palliative. Flags were compared by opioid user type across the pre-intervention period (07/2006-06/2007), intermittent period (08/2007-07-2008), and post-period (04/2009-03/2010). Results: During each period there were approximately 380,000 acute uses, 32,000 chronic, 220,000 intermittent and 5,000 palliative users. Most process and outcome measures improved during the post-guideline periods (Tables 1 and 2). Chronic users had the highest proportion of poly-pharmacy and outcome flags. Opioid users classified as palliative had the highest proportion of initial methadone dosing violations. Conclusions: While the number of opioid users remained constant across time periods there has been a decrease in unsafe use of opioids and opioid-related adverse events in Utah since the opioid prescribing guidelines were promulgated and received media attention.

    Funding: CDC R21

    Figures:

    Poster 159a

    Poster 159b

  • Home
  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Community
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Close

Members Only Alert Message

Please login to access AAPM member only information.
Forgot your login information?

Sign Up Today!

Join AAPM today and be part of the primary organization for physicians practicing in the specialty of pain medicine and begin accessing AAPM member benefits. 

Join
Or

Log In

Please log in and you will be redirected to the requested page.

Log In