The American Academy Of Pain Medicine

The physicians' voice in pain medicine
  • Foundation
  • Store
  • Career Center
  • Press
  • Join-Renew
Search: Go
Member Login: Login

Enter the AAPM
Members' Community

  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Safe Prescribing Resources
  • PI-CME Portal

Library

Home > Library > For Pain Researchers > 2013 Poster Abstracts
  • Research in the News
  • For Pain Researchers
    • 2013 Poster Abstracts
    • 2012 Poster Abstracts
    • Research Resources
    • Research Presentations
    • Search Clinical Trials (NIH)
    • Register a Clinical Trial (NIH)
    • Medline - US National Library of Medicine
  • Clinical Guidelines and Resources
  • Pain Facts
  • Archives
  • FDA Updates, Recalls and Warnings
  • Presented at the 2013 AAPM Annual Meeting « Back

    167

    Measuring the Functional Impact of Adverse Events (AEs)

    William Rogers, PhD, whrogers3@verizon.net1, Hong Chang, PhD1, Lien Vo2, Gary Vorsanger, PhD, MD2, (1) Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, (2) Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey

    Introduction: Impact of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) on patient functionality in opioid studies is widely understood but imprecisely measured. Materials and Methods: Post-hoc analysis of two 15-week IRB-approved randomized, double-blind, active and placebo-controlled clinical trials in subjects with moderate-severe chronic low back pain (N=1023) or knee osteoarthritis (N=965) was conducted. Subjects were randomized to tapentadol ER, oxycodone CR, or placebo. TEAEs were grouped into 14 function-based AE categories based on patient-reported descriptions of TEAEs during the study classified into preferred terms. We compared the 8 SF-36 scales scores for subjects with and without AE, controlling for pain relief level. Results: AEs lowered non-pain (physical, role, social functioning, vitality, and mental health) SF-36 scores by 4.8 points (median) compared with assessments without AEs; however, the magnitude varied by event type and SF-36 scale. For example, constipation reduced role-emotional functioning by 6.8 points but mental health by only 2.2 points. Effects were larger for more severe AEs and those requiring countermeasures but did not differ by age (<65 vs. ≥65), treatment, or patient population. Compared with placebo, treatments achieved pain relief with positive impact upon SF-36, but substantially and differentially increased the probability of some AEs. For example, 31%, 16% and 6% of oxycodone CR, tapentadol ER and placebo subjects had constipation, respectively (differences P<.01). Similar results were observed for nausea, dizziness, psychological, vitality-related, and dermatologic TEAE but equivalent rates were observed for 8 other types. Conclusions: The findings suggest opioid-associated TEAE alter the ability of patients to function and may interfere with pain management.

    Funding: This research was supported by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC.

  • Home
  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Community
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Close

Members Only Alert Message

Please login to access AAPM member only information.
Forgot your login information?

Sign Up Today!

Join AAPM today and be part of the primary organization for physicians practicing in the specialty of pain medicine and begin accessing AAPM member benefits. 

Join
Or

Log In

Please log in and you will be redirected to the requested page.

Log In