The American Academy Of Pain Medicine

The physicians' voice in pain medicine
  • Foundation
  • Store
  • Career Center
  • Press
  • Join-Renew
Search: Go
Member Login: Login

Enter the AAPM
Members' Community

  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Safe Prescribing Resources
  • PI-CME Portal

Library

Home > Library > For Pain Researchers > 2013 Poster Abstracts
  • Research in the News
  • For Pain Researchers
    • 2013 Poster Abstracts
    • 2012 Poster Abstracts
    • Research Resources
    • Research Presentations
    • Search Clinical Trials (NIH)
    • Register a Clinical Trial (NIH)
    • Medline - US National Library of Medicine
  • Clinical Guidelines and Resources
  • Pain Facts
  • Archives
  • FDA Updates, Recalls and Warnings
  • Presented at the 2013 AAPM Annual Meeting « Back

    172

    Urine Drug Testing and Pain Management: The Role of Patient Characteristics in Physician Decision-Making

    Arthur W. Wood, MD, arthurwood@gmail.com1, Michelle Roach, MD1, Edward Michna, MD JD2, Ajay D. Wasan, MD MSc2, (1) Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, (2) Brigham and Women's Hospital, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts

    Introduction: The frequency of urine drug testing (UDT) in the outpatient pain management setting varies with practitioner. This study aims to determine what patient characteristics are associated with a physician’s decision to obtain UDT at an initial clinic evaluation. Methods: Initial encounters of 200 opioid-taking subjects presenting to a pain management clinic were retrospectively reviewed with IRB approval. Subjects were divided into two groups: those who received UDT at the initial or second encounter and those who did not. Various subject characteristics were recorded including sex, age, single versus multiple opioid formulation usage, history of psychiatric diagnosis such as major depression, and history of illicit substance use. Results: Of the 200 subjects, 120 received UDT at the initial or second encounter (S group) while 80 did not (NS group). Subjects in the S group were significantly younger (P<.005) and had greater prevalence of both psychiatric diagnoses (P<0.005) and illicit substance use (P<.001). Sex and single versus multiple opioid formulation usage were not associated with subject group. Conclusions: In this study, age, psychiatric comorbidity, and history of illicit substance use were associated with a pain management physician’s decision to obtain UDT on a new opioid-taking clinic patient. Such physician decision making processes may undermine the ability to institute "universal precautions" across clinic populations. Further investigation is needed to delineate the relationship between patient characteristics and physician decision-making with respect to drug testing.

    Funding: None

  • Home
  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Community
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Close

Members Only Alert Message

Please login to access AAPM member only information.
Forgot your login information?

Sign Up Today!

Join AAPM today and be part of the primary organization for physicians practicing in the specialty of pain medicine and begin accessing AAPM member benefits. 

Join
Or

Log In

Please log in and you will be redirected to the requested page.

Log In