The American Academy Of Pain Medicine

The physicians' voice in pain medicine
  • Foundation
  • Store
  • Career Center
  • Press
  • Join-Renew
Search: Go
Member Login: Login

Enter the AAPM
Members' Community

  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Safe Prescribing Resources
  • PI-CME Portal

Library

Home > Library > For Pain Researchers > 2013 Poster Abstracts
  • Research in the News
  • For Pain Researchers
    • 2013 Poster Abstracts
    • 2012 Poster Abstracts
    • Research Resources
    • Research Presentations
    • Search Clinical Trials (NIH)
    • Register a Clinical Trial (NIH)
    • Medline - US National Library of Medicine
  • Clinical Guidelines and Resources
  • Pain Facts
  • Archives
  • FDA Updates, Recalls and Warnings
  • Presented at the 2013 AAPM Annual Meeting « Back

    217

    Improved Pain Relief with Position-Adaptive Stimulation: Results of the RestoreSensor Study

    Lynn R. Webster, MD, lrwebstermd@gmail.com1, David M. Schultz, MD2, Ye Tan, MS3, Mark Sun, PhD3, (1) CRILifetree, Salt Lake City, Utah, (2) MAPS Medical Pain Clinics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, (3) Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota

    View Poster

    Introduction: The effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in the management of chronic back pain has been documented in a large body of literature including prospective randomized controlled trials. The RestoreSensor neurostimulator with the AdaptiveStim feature (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) was developed to automatically address the problem of variation in the intensity of neurostimulation with body position. Patient benefits of the new feature could include added convenience and/or improved pain relief. We previously reported that 86.5% of patients met the primary efficacy objective when using the AdaptiveStim feature. We report on a sub-analysis assessing only improved pain relief. Methods: Patients with chronic trunk and/or leg pain who had a successful trial screening were enrolled in the 12-week IRB-approved study during which they experienced position-adaptive stimulation or conventional stimulation each for 6 weeks. Patients then rated pain relief and convenience separately on 5-point Likert scales. Results: A total of 79 patients were enrolled at 10 study centers in the US. Seventy-six patients were implanted with a RestoreSensor neurostimulator. Of the 74 patients included in an intent-to-treat analysis, 63 (85.1%) reported that position-adaptive stimulation provided better pain relief: 40 (54.1%) reported much better pain relief and 23 (31.1%) reported somewhat better pain relief, compared to conventional stimulation. Conclusions: Use of the position-adaptive stimulation feature resulted in improved pain relief for most patients when compared with conventional stimulation. The results also correlate with previously reported improvements in convenience, supporting the use of the new therapy feature in the management of chronic pain.

    Funding: The RestoreSensor study was supported by Medtronic Neuromodulation.

  • Home
  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Community
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Close

Members Only Alert Message

Please login to access AAPM member only information.
Forgot your login information?

Sign Up Today!

Join AAPM today and be part of the primary organization for physicians practicing in the specialty of pain medicine and begin accessing AAPM member benefits. 

Join
Or

Log In

Please log in and you will be redirected to the requested page.

Log In