The American Academy Of Pain Medicine

The physicians' voice in pain medicine
  • Foundation
  • Store
  • Career Center
  • Press
  • Join-Renew
Search: Go
Member Login: Login

Enter the AAPM
Members' Community

  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Safe Prescribing Resources
  • PI-CME Portal

Library

Home > Library > For Pain Researchers > 2013 Poster Abstracts
  • Research in the News
  • For Pain Researchers
    • 2013 Poster Abstracts
    • 2012 Poster Abstracts
    • Research Resources
    • Research Presentations
    • Search Clinical Trials (NIH)
    • Register a Clinical Trial (NIH)
    • Medline - US National Library of Medicine
  • Clinical Guidelines and Resources
  • Pain Facts
  • Archives
  • FDA Updates, Recalls and Warnings
  • Presented at the 2013 AAPM Annual Meeting« Back

    236

    Assessing Dose and Practice Effects of Hypnosis for Chronic Low Back Pain

    Gabriel Tan, PhD ABPP, psygt@nus.edu.sg1, (1) National University of Singapore, Singapore

    Introduction: The efficacy of self-hypnosis training for decreasing chronic pain intensity is well-established. However, little research has examined the "dose" (number of sessions) needed or the importance of practice outside of the session for maximizing treatment benefits. Methods: 100 patients with a history of moderate to severe chronic low back pain were randomized to one of four treatment conditions: Group 1: 8 sessions of face-to-face instruction on self–hypnosis without home practice, Group 2: 8 sessions of face-to-face instruction on self–hypnosis plus home practice, Group 3: 2 sessions of face-to-face instruction on self–hypnosis plus home practice, and Group 4: a biofeedback-assisted relaxation control condition. Results: Results indicated (1) a significantly greater treatment effect on pain intensity in the combined hypnosis group than in the control condition (p =.041, eta square = .042) and (2) large and significant reductions in both pain intensity and pain interference for all 3 hypnosis groups over time (pain intensity: p < .0001, η2 =.500; pain interference: p < .0001, η2 =.450). However, improvement was similar for the 3 hypnosis groups. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d for paired t-tests) for pre- to post-treatment effects for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 0.810, 1.267, and 1.179, respectively, for pain intensity and 0.911, 1.012, and 0.889, respectively, for pain interference, all indicating large but similar effects. Conclusions: Pain reduction was not substantially increased by adding 6 additional sessions of hypnosis training after an initial 2 or by home practice. This was also found at 6 months follow-up.

    Funding: VHA Rehabilitation Research and Development

  • Home
  • Member Center
  • Patient Center
  • Library
  • Advocacy
  • Practice Management
  • CME
  • Annual Meeting
  • Contact Us
  • Members' Community
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
Close

Members Only Alert Message

Please login to access AAPM member only information.
Forgot your login information?

Sign Up Today!

Join AAPM today and be part of the primary organization for physicians practicing in the specialty of pain medicine and begin accessing AAPM member benefits. 

Join
Or

Log In

Please log in and you will be redirected to the requested page.

Log In